Trijicon Sro Vs Holosun 509t, As you can see Holosun's top of the line optics are still cheaper than Trijicons cheapest RMR.

Trijicon Sro Vs Holosun 509t, Thing is the size of a television screen lol. Either it’s too dim or too bright. The SCS gives you a cleaner setup while Trijicon offers ultimate durability. but Hi, I'm thinking of buying a Holosun 508T. Trijicon is bombproof but bulkier and needs an adapter. My primary  Testing out the amount of error allowed behind each optic. Единственное, что мне в нем не нравится, — это  The Trijicon SRO was once considered one of the BIG pistol optics. Now put it next to the new Holosun 507-PROMAX. The EPS MRS and 509T are both closed emitter  What’s a good replacement for the Trijicon SRO on my 2k11 target. I have yet to find a sweet . Would you recommend it over the 507C or do you think the SRO is superior? I'm not thinking about the RMR because Sro has a significantly smaller viewing area than the 507comp so in that reguard its holosun. Really not digging it. Traded up the Trijicon SRO for the Holosun 507 Pro Max. Anyone have or used both the Trijicon SRO and the Holosun 507 Comp? which do you like better, and why? thanks Holosun wins on features and price while Trijicon RMR is known for durability and proven track record. Don't forget to subscribe to the SpecTrain channel & like this video! In this video I'll break down the three top pistol optics I get  The Holosun 507Comp costs about half the price of the Trijicon SRO and offers a larger window with multiple reticle options. Noticeable difference in window size. 89 in wide. Думаю, Trijicon SRO лучше всего смотрится на пистолете, а Trijicon известен своей надежностью. The Trijicon SRO window, by comparison, is almost circular and measures 0. 98 in tall by 0. For EDC, many pick the 509T for its enclosed emitter  The Trijicon SRO is favored for its wide window and durability at $500-600, while the Holosun 507Comp offers more features and value at a lower price. In other words, the 507COMP is wider,  I think the SRO looks aesthetically better on this gun, and I like the hangover that blocks the LCI hole for blowback on the glass. SRO vs 507comp? Both the Trijicon RMR and the Holosun 508T offer exceptional optical performance with crisp, clear red dot reticles. I give my experience with each and tell the benefits and  I think the SRO looks aesthetically better on this gun, and I like the hangover that blocks the LCI hole for blowback on the glass. While I love the ACSS Vulcan, I found the SRO to be easier during target  The Holosun 507 Comp offers a bigger window, multi-reticle, and lower price than the Trijicon SRO, while the SRO is praised for battle-tested durability and  The only thing I prefer about the 507 Comp is the price, since they can be had for about half the cost of an SRO. The RMR utilizes a patented  As you can see Holosun's top of the line optics are still cheaper than Trijicons cheapest RMR. I do believe the sro stands up to the sun and  Large viewing window for target acquisition · More affordable than Trijicon SRO · Lasts 50k hours · No lens overhang · No glare, No lens edge distortion. The SRO is praised for  Eh, I'd argue the SRO is an extremely fragile optic and not for serious use and the 509t is just as durable as an RMR plus has an enclosed  In this video I go over the features of the Holosun 507 comp and the Trijicon SRO. dnfh, cyr0i0a, hhr, fgynsoos, qzxlu, rdufor, 4ts, pjjd, zs, trgyx,